<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version='2.0'>
  <channel>
    <generator>
      RSS data feeds are designed to be  used within RSS reader software or by  web-news aggregators. Most browsers do  not handle RSS files by default.  You may wish to download an RSS reader  application to take advantage of this feature.
    </generator>
    <docs> http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss </docs>
    <webMaster> webmaster@ip.com (IP.com Web Master) </webMaster>
    <lastBuildDate> Sun, 6 Apr 2008 02:03:21 -0400 </lastBuildDate>
    <language> en-us </language>
    <title> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </title>
    <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/ </link>
    <description> This RSS feed provides the most recent comments added to  the IP.com Patent Debate Forum </description>
    
    <item>
      <title> Patent about a new device for building fire escape | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_33 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_33 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sun, 6 Apr 2008 06:03:21 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Once people are trapped in storied-building fires , they always have to wait for firefighters` rescue . However , lots of facts tell us that sometimes death always comes before rescue , that`s why there were always so many dead in storied-building fire . So how to help the people trapped to escape from the burning buildings as soon as possible and rescue themselves successfully without waiting ,  is just the only aim of my invention.       &lt;br /&gt;http://jinshi.selfrescue.googlepages.com/&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by hzzj, 2008-04-06 06:03:21&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Delivery of oral drugs | 20050158394: Delivery of oral drugs </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050158394?tab=posts#com_id_32 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050158394?tab=posts#com_id_32 </guid>
    <pubDate> Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:47:00 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> aa&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by digambar, 2008-03-20 14:47:00&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050158394?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Pericardial Augmentation | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_31 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_31 </guid>
    <pubDate> Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:50:54 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Development of a pericardial device engineered to augment electrical systole in heart failure requires the consent, cooperation and services of a large animal EP lab committed to prove or disprove disclosed theory. Theory suggests electrically ischemic regions of myocardium unreachable by vascular intervention can be addressed and measured inexpensively in performance terms EF (Ejection Fraction) and CO (Cardiac Output) by an active externally applied electrical web deployed in the pericardial space.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2008-03-19 02:50:54&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> IOTA Patent | 20040252774: System and method for generating a modified IOTA pulse for reducing adjacent channel interference (ACI) in an isotropic orthogonal transfer algorithm (IOTA) orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) system </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040252774?tab=posts#com_id_30 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040252774?tab=posts#com_id_30 </guid>
    <pubDate> Wed, 27 Feb 2008 02:18:45 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> null&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by kpk, 2008-02-27 02:18:45&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040252774?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> prior art | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_29 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_29 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:20:33 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> null&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2008-02-12 03:20:33&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> pericardial augmentation | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_28 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_28 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 12 Feb 2008 03:18:05 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> null&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2008-02-12 03:18:05&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> heart failure | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_27 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_27 </guid>
    <pubDate> Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:14:37 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> Humble Agent - I appreciate your notation of closure of the disclosed IP. As a small entity, I regret that I do not have the legal and financial resources to futher prosecute ownership of the contested IP. &lt;br /&gt;Because you continue to run the IP on the WWW, it appears that you endorse the novelty in a claim that represents an external pacemaker that selectively depolarizes the myocardium from the "outside in" rather than the contemporary "inside out" prior art of intravascularly deployed pacemakers. &lt;br /&gt;I would be most interested to remain as an observer as claims relative to pacemaker intervention in heart failure develop. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;div style="text-align: justify;"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2008-01-25 03:14:37&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> no longer updating | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_26 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_26 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:03:27 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> I'm not sure why, but PatentDebate isn't showing any applications published after 9/13/2007, so you can't comment on the application referenced below.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by humbleagent, 2008-01-19 17:03:27&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Patent issued | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_25 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_25 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:48:24 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> This application has issued as patent #  7,260,995 on 8/28/07.  There is no need to comment further on it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A child application, publication number         US 2007-0266794 A1 is currently undergoing examination.  Comments on the pending claims would be worthwhile at http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20070266794.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by humbleagent, 2008-01-19 16:48:24&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> application abandoned | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_24 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_24 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:40:27 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> This patent application was abandoned on 9/14/06.  There is no need to comment further on it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can check on the status of a pending patent application on the USPTO PAIR (Patent Application Information Retreval) web site http://portal.uspto.gov/external/portal/pair&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by humbleagent, 2008-01-19 16:40:27&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Infringment | 20060129171: Oral care implement </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts#com_id_23 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts#com_id_23 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:45:59 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> David,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The answer is "it depends".  If you are looking to enforce your patent, then what you need to do is find examples of what Colgate is actually selling in stores, compare that to your claims, and if what they are selling has every limitation of your claims, then they should be getting a license from you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the other hand, if you want to make sure that Colgate doesn't get a patent on an invention that is at least obvious in light of your publication, then you need to monitor the examination their patent on the USPTO PAIR web site.  If the examiner doesn't cite your patent, there are ways to bring your patent to the examiner's attention.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Does this help?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by humbleagent, 2008-01-19 15:45:59&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Wikipedia Link | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_22 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_22 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 8 Jan 2008 01:45:58 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> Wikipedia link acknowledged and appreciated.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2008-01-08 01:45:58&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Pericardial Augmentation | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_21 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_21 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 15 Dec 2007 05:11:58 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> Please see prior work. An external electrical grid/non-blood exposed pacemaker in the pericardial space is posited as a means of addressing diastolic heart failure. Chagasic heart failure is an expedient model of this entity. Crosstalk between Dr Daniel Iosa from Cordoba, Argentina and Drs. Peskin and McQueen  at the Courant Institute is suggested&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2007-12-15 05:11:58&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Confused by Claim 1 | 20060015473: Dynamic partitioning of storage media for mixed applications </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060015473?tab=posts#com_id_20 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060015473?tab=posts#com_id_20 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:36:25 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Claim1 includes the following express: a first partition having a first file system comprising (i) a plurality of first clusters each configured to store data having accesses faster than a first worst case data transfer rate and (ii) a first dedicated space not used by said plurality of first clusters...   The said "dedicated space" is within the "first file system", and the "first file system comprises plurality of first clusters", but why the "first clusters not use the first dedicated space"?&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by tianbing, 2007-10-16 10:36:25&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060015473?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Family Member US20060081058A1 and New ESD Rules | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_19 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_19 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:08:00 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> US20060081058A1 is a family member of this patnet consisting of 43 cliams which excced the new 5/25 rule. The present application's claims do not seem to be patently indistinguishable form it's predecessor.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by texasflood, 2007-09-23 19:08:00&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Automotive Industy - Expandable Foam Inserts | 20070090666: STRUCTRUAL REINFORCEMENT MEMBER AND METHOD OF USE THEREFOR </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20070090666?tab=posts#com_id_18 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20070090666?tab=posts#com_id_18 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:22:51 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Please comment&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by texasflood, 2007-09-22 11:22:51&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20070090666?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Attention to Prior Art - potential 103 rejections | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_17 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_17 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:09:33 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> There are numerous systems that employ similar albiet not exact means of electrostimulation via a sack or mesh enclosure. Please refere to US Patent 6876887 and look at its forward citations. Also see claims 1, 6, and 7&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by texasflood, 2007-09-22 11:09:33&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> sssss | 20050185590: Methods and systems for simultaneous, multi-channel link fault sectionalization testing </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050185590?tab=posts#com_id_16 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050185590?tab=posts#com_id_16 </guid>
    <pubDate> Fri, 3 Aug 2007 01:36:34 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> null&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by huangxintian, 2007-08-03 01:36:34&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20050185590?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Advanced Technology | 20060090379: Autonomous loading shovel system </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060090379?tab=posts#com_id_15 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060090379?tab=posts#com_id_15 </guid>
    <pubDate> Wed, 25 Jul 2007 19:14:44 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> This represents technology far in advance of any of the present research projects.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by ken f, 2007-07-25 19:14:44&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060090379?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> tongue cleaner on reverse side of toothbrush head | 20060129171: Oral care implement </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts#com_id_14 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts#com_id_14 </guid>
    <pubDate> Fri, 29 Jun 2007 15:37:47 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> This design is a ripoff of my own patent filed 8 months earlier: US 6,729,789. Is there any reason for Colgate not to request licensing rather than attempt to patent an already patented idea?&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by david, 2007-06-29 15:37:47&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060129171?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> pericardial augmentation | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_12 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_12 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:24:01 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Imagine one is hopelessy lost in the deepest desert and a grand camel (or perhaps rodeo bull) named Systole walks up. If you can leap upon his back, the first few steps will likely be very stressful. If control is attained, one might make it back again. I have (unsuccessfully) discussed this application with several corporate entities and still need help once the signal is delivered from the grid (myocardial IT). I welcome further authorship in this endeavor from other inventors interested in computational applications, electrodes and field management as well as minimimalization of engineering measures (such as scarring, ablation or suturing) that degrade diastole. Help from the Courant Institute or similar sponsor is solicited. Thanks, Leslie A. Beben&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2007-03-27 02:24:01&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Bogus claims | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_10 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_10 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 23 Jan 2007 19:54:19 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> What exactly are these guys claiming - even though they have never built a product or reduced an idea to practice - that hasn't already been done in the 40+ years of MEMS pressure sensor industry?  I question their motivation if their idea is to claim infringement.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by onix, 2007-01-23 19:54:19&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> Useless | 20060219020: Pressure sensor having thin pressure sensing membrane </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_9 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts#com_id_9 </guid>
    <pubDate> Wed, 17 Jan 2007 08:37:20 -0500 </pubDate>
      <description> null&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by onix, 2007-01-17 08:37:20&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060219020?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> pericardial augmentation | 20040186522: Apparatus for pericardial augmentation </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_8 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts#com_id_8 </guid>
    <pubDate> Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:38:53 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> IP.com Patent Debate - Happy to see your attention to my patent application. How did my application find its way here and how can I help? Leslie A. Beben&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by oldguy, 2006-08-19 23:38:53&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20040186522?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title> See: chEBI work | 20060053173: System and method for support of chemical data within multi-relational ontologies </title>
      <link> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060053173?tab=posts#com_id_7 </link>
      <guid isPermaLink='true'> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060053173?tab=posts#com_id_7 </guid>
    <pubDate> Tue, 16 May 2006 18:48:51 -0400 </pubDate>
      <description> Expression of chemical relationships and reactions in this manner is not unique. Please see: &lt;a href="http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~kirill/biometal/SABIC20041206.ppt" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~kirill/biometal/SABIC20041206.ppt    As well as the application:  http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ontology-lookup/browse.do?ontName=CHEBI&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;including the molecular structure ontology browser.&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;small&gt;Posted by jamestolby, 2006-05-16 18:48:51&lt;/small&gt; </description>
      <source url='http://www.patentdebate.com/rss/Comments.xml'> IP.com Patent Debate: Recent Comments </source>
      <comments> http://www.patentdebate.com/PATAPP/20060053173?tab=posts </comments>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
